Who should edit my book?

Choosing your editor, be it for your book, thesis or business blog, takes thought.

Consider:

  • qualifications
    • It’s been easy for someone to say ‘I was good at English at school, I’ll be a good editor’.
    • Things have changed since then: common usage, readers’ expectations and new ways of communicating over-ride so many of the ‘old rules’.
    • Ask about their editing, writing or publishing qualifications, and if they are a member of or accredited by a professional body.
  • experience
    • Editing covers a wide range of skills (structural or developmental, copy or line, proofreading) across a range of industries (publishing, journalism, academia, business, technical, corporate, government) and genres (non-fiction, fantasy, children’s).
      • Can they explain what editing level your project needs? A proficient copyeditor without structural editing skills may miss those things that will make your document shine.
  • client feedback
    • Was the editor recommended to you?
    • Can you relate to the testimonials on their website?
  • standards
    • Do they work to a dictionary and style guide that’s appropriate to your project?
      • If you’re writing for an Australian audience, you’ll want to use an Australian dictionary. If your report needs to cite other sources, can they work with the referencing style you nominate?
    • Will they set up a style sheet for your project? Will they share it with you so that your additions to the writing is consistent?
  • how they work
    • Will they track their changes electronically, and can they help you understand the process? Do they work on hard-copy if that’s what you need? Can they mark up a pdf file?
  • contacts with other professionals
    • Can they recommend a designer or illustrator, a printer or e-publishing expert or software, a traditional or independent publisher to help you complete your project?

That’s your starting point.

Enjoy your writing and your relationship with your editor.

Northern Editorial

confused-2681507_1920

If you’ve written a book and you intend to get it published this is probably a question you’ve asked yourself. And you may have been going round and round in circles trying to figure it out.

If you’ve hit the jackpot and managed to get a publisher this may be out of your hands as the publisher will likely have a pool of in-house or freelance publishers.

If you intend to self-publish (and many respected authors are taking this route) you will have to find your own editor, and this is where it can get tricky.

With this in mind here are a few pointers for all of you who are having a hard time …

Who should edit your book?

editing proofreading publishing (c) Nic McPhee Flikr

  1. Someone who’s trained.

While your old English teacher, best friend, co-worker, sibling, parent or dog-walker may do a brilliant job of spotting typos, or the…

View original post 712 more words

Plain English – what are the business benefits?

Your nonfiction writing will shine when you include principles of Plain English.

Laura Ripper | Copy-editing and Proofreading

A picture of a piggybank

If you run a business, you probably know that customers appreciate clear communication. They want to be able to find important information quickly – for example, about products and services, how to find you or how to return an item they’ve bought. Direct, concise and jargon-free text saves them time, frustration and effort. It gives your customers a better experience of working with you.

But what are the benefits for you – and your company? How can writing in plain English help you achieve your business goals, such as making a profit or building your brand? Is communicating clearly anything more than ‘doing the right thing’?

Using plain English can help your business in three main ways:

  1. It saves money
  2. It saves time
  3. It builds your reputation

It saves money

– and it makes money, too.

If your marketing materials, letters and newsletters present information clearly, your customers are more…

View original post 838 more words

What’s wrong with the passive voice?

Ways to reduce stuffiness in business and nonfiction writing.
Perhaps it’s time to check your writing – and ask for help if you need help coming up with non-stuffiness.

Stroppy Editor

Michael Gove, the Education Secretary, has joined the Campaign Against the Passive Voice. He follows in the footsteps of Strunk and White (whose section on the passive voice, while more nuanced than many people recognise, is calamitously misleading) and of George Orwell (who complained about the passive while using it extensively himself, even in the same sentence as his complaint).

The campaign isn’t wholly wrong, but it goes too far and it doesn’t properly understand the problem. The passive voice is often better than the active, and its overuse is usually a symptom of something else.

What’s the difference?

Roughly: in the active voice, the agent performing the action is the grammatical subject of the sentence and the recipient of the action is the grammatical object. The passive voice switches this around, making the recipient of the action the grammatical subject and the agent the object. Passive verbs are formed…

View original post 1,106 more words

Is “Alright” Ever Alright? – Guest Post by Kathy Steinemann…

Useful insights primarily for fiction writers, although we nonfiction writers and editors will learn something too.
Enjoy … and share your comments.

Chris The Story Reading Ape's Blog

Image Source: Dictionary.com

According to EtymOnline.com, alright was attested in print by 1884.

Writers argue about its use. Some insist it’s appropriate, while others stand on the no-nada-nix-never soapbox.

Who is correct? This post will try to clear the confusion.

What do the experts say?

I searched several sources and found the following results.

No, alright is unacceptable.

Painless Grammar, by Rebecca Elliott, PhD

The Chicago Manual of Style

AP Stylebook

Lapsing into a Comma, by Bill Walsh

All right is the only form listed.

The Synonym Finder, by J. I. Rodale

Elements of Style, by William Strunk Jr.

Alright is informal or nonstandard and less acceptable than all right.

Dictionary.com

Merriam-Webster.com

Dictionary.Cambridge.org

OxfordDictionaries.com

MacMillanDictionary.com

YourDictionary.com

CollinsDictionary.com

TheFreeDictionary.com

My hunt through several Ray Bradbury e-books found no instances of alright.

After more research…

View original post 924 more words

Avoiding The Rush Job

‘Proofreading, editing or indexing a document isn’t done by a computer program, it’s carried out by an actual human being.’

Northern Editorial

time, clocks, rush job

Many is the time I’ve had to say no to a job.

It was not because I didn’t want to take the client on – sometimes I’ve kicked myself because the job was right up my street. It also wasn’t due to a full calendar. It was because the timescale was so ridiculously short I wouldn’t have had time to do the job needed.

Let’s elaborate…

Proofreading, editing or indexing a document isn’t done by a computer program, it’s carried out by an actual human being. Asking a professional to carry out some work on a book assumes a couple of things:

  1. The professional has enough time to read through the document
  2. The professional has enough time to digest what has been written
  3. The professional has enough time to carry out the task at hand.

clock, time, watch

Take for example a straightforward proofread (not an edit) of a 100,000 word document:

The…

View original post 812 more words